Until Asics released their comparisons of the types of runners that would benefit from the Metaspeed Sky vs the Metaspeed Edge, I never really had heard of any other company's research into this topic. I went back and looked at my own regular runs and races on Garmin. Usually I was around 1.25 meters per stride at 180 spm at around 7:30-7:40 pace regular runs. In a recent 5k, I was 1.5 meters per stride and 188 spm. I wonder if Running Warehouse or Asics could plug in numbers and tell you which shoe they think would benefit you more? I would be very interested in that information. I don't have a marathon on the schedule until January, but definitely would take that type of advice when deciding between the two Asics shoes.
Adding: in my most recent Marathon in Atlanta, 2020. My average stride was 1.36 meters with a 179 spm. Ended with a 2:54. So if my average daily run is around 180 with a stride of 1.25 meters or so, I guess I would fall into the "Sky" mold where I'm increasing my speed by just taking longer strides? Honestly, I thought I would be the other way around. I definitely run at a higher cadence in 5ks, maybe not as much in a marathon.
Adding: in my most recent Marathon in Atlanta, 2020. My average stride was 1.36 meters with a 179 spm. Ended with a 2:54. So if my average daily run is around 180 with a stride of 1.25 meters or so, I guess I would fall into the "Sky" mold where I'm increasing my speed by just taking longer strides? Honestly, I thought I would be the other way around. I definitely run at a higher cadence in 5ks, maybe not as much in a marathon.
Last edited: